The information is based on articles devoted to the new finds of macrofungi in regions of Russian Far East (Rebriev et al., 2020, 2021). The dataset includes 307 occurrence records of 189 identified to species. Each annotated record provides details about specimen ecology and collection information: locality, habitat, substrate, specimen herbarium numbers, collectors and determiners as well as notes on rarity and peculiar features of some species. The material was accessioned in LE (Saint Petersburg), MAG (Magadan), SVER (Ekaterinburg), VLA (Vladivostok), ABGI (Blagoveshensk) herbaria, as well as in the Yu. Rebriev (YuR), H. J. Beker (HJB) and H. Kotiranta (HK) personal collections. The identification was carried out mainly by morphological methods. In some cases, a molecular genetic method was used as an additional or main one.
この オカレンス（観察データと標本) リソース内のデータは、1 つまたは複数のデータ テーブルとして生物多様性データを共有するための標準化された形式であるダーウィン コア アーカイブ (DwC-A) として公開されています。
コア データ テーブルには、307 レコードが含まれています。
この IPT はデータをアーカイブし、データ リポジトリとして機能します。データとリソースのメタデータは、 ダウンロード セクションからダウンロードできます。 バージョン テーブルから公開可能な他のバージョンを閲覧でき、リソースに加えられた変更を知ることができます。
次の表は、公にアクセス可能な公開バージョンのリソースのみ表示しています。
研究者はこの研究内容を以下のように引用する必要があります。:
Rebriev Y, Beker H, Bogacheva A, Bulakh E, Eberhardt U, Kochunova N, Kotiranta H, Popov E, Sazanova N, Shiryaev A, Zvyagina E (2022): New species of macromycetes for regions of the Russian Far East. v1.0. Yugra State University Biological Collection (YSU BC). Dataset/Occurrence. http://ipt.ugrasu.ru:8080/resource?r=fareastmacrofungi&v=1.0
Occurrence; Ascomycetes; biodiversity; Basidiomycetes; fungal distribution; macromycetes; Russia
The Far East spans through three natural zones and covers 20 floristic regions (Lower plants…, 1990). Its natural zones are characterized by a wide variety of vegetation, including Arctic deserts, tundra and forest tundra, taiga and broad-leaved forests. Mycological research has been carried out in all regions of Far East; among them, Primorskiy Krai is the best studied territory. The diversity of fungi in the more northern regions has been studied to a lesser extent. The study of macroscopic fungi has a long history and the results of many years of research are represented in a number of publications (Karatygin et al., 1999; Sazanova, 2009; Bulakh, 2016; Bogacheva et al., 2018; Bukharova, 2018). The systematic research of basidiomycetes was initiated in the 1940’s by L. N. Vasilieva. Mycologists of the Komarov Botanical Institute RAS and other scientific centers in Russia and abroad played a significant role in the study of fungi of the Far East. To date, about 1442 species of agaricoid and about 600 species of aphyllophoroid fungi are known from the entire Russian Far East (Bulakh, 2016). The species lists for geographical and administrative regions and individual protected areas have been published in numerous articles and monographs. Some finds of new and noteworthy species in the region are reported in separate works (Bulakh, 2008; Spirin et al., 2013; Shiryaev, 2013, 2018; Kiyashko et al., 2014; Sazanova, 2015; Sazanova, Rebriev, 2019; Volobuev et al., 2019). Many new species have been described based on combined classical and molecular approach in recent years: agaricoid (Noordeloos, Morozova, 2010; Malysheva et al., 2013; Justo et al., 2014), gasteroid (Rebriev, Bulakh, 2015; Crous et al., 2019) and aphyllophoroid fungi (Zhou et al., 2014). In total, more than 60 new species have been described in the course of the studies of fungi in Russian Far East. Despite the collective research effort described above, a large proportion of the vast Far Eastern territories still remains insufficiently or poorly known. The mycobiota of a number of nature reserves has not been fully studied. The considerable amount of material accumulated in the major herbaria collections has not been analysed and published. Due to the critical analysis of many groups of basidiomycetes with an advent of molecular methods, accumulated herbaria collections have to be sufficiently revised. The abundance of material waiting for publication determined the need to initiate a separate series of articles, similar to the series "New species for regional mycobiotas of Russia” (Bolshakov et al., 2016). This publication introduces the findings of macromycetes that are new for individual administrative divisions of the Far East or for the entire region altogether.
| 座標（緯度経度） |
南 西 [42.32, 119.69], 北 東 [71.6, 169.66] |
Macrofungi (Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes)
| Phylum |
Ascomycota,
Basidiomycota
|
| 開始日 / 終了日 |
1929-07-10 / 2020-10-10 |
The information is based on articles devoted to the new finds of macrofungi in regions of Russian Far East (Rebriev et al., 2020, 2021).
| Study Extent |
The material was accessioned in LE (Saint Petersburg), MAG (Magadan), SVER (Ekaterinburg), VLA (Vladivostok), ABGI (Blagoveshensk) herbaria, as well as in the Yu. Rebriev (YuR), A. Shiryaev (A. Shiryaev), H. J. Beker (HJB) and H. Kotiranta (HK) personal collections. |
| Quality Control |
The identification was carried out mainly by morphological methods. In some cases, a molecular genetic method was used as an additional or main one. |
Method step description:
-
Each annotated record provides details about specimen ecology and collection information: locality, habitat, substrate, specimen herbarium numbers, collectors and determiners as well as notes on rarity and peculiar features of some species.
-
Geographical coordinates were determined by the authors at the time of collecting samples using GPS. In the absence of such data, the coordinates were determined using the resource https://www.google.ru/maps
| Curatorialユニット |
カウント 307
+/- 0
dried specimens
|
-
Rebriev Yu.A., Bulakh E.M., Sazanova N.A. et al. New species of macromycetes for regions of Russian Far East. 1. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya. 2020. V. 54 (4). P. 278–288. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0026364820040091 https://doi.org/10.31857/S0026364820040091
-
Rebriev Yu.A., Bogacheva A.V., Beker H.J. et al. New species of macromycetes for regions of the Russian Far East. 2. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya. 2021. V. 55 (5). P. 318–330. https://doi.org/10.31857/S002636482105007X https://doi.org/10.31857/S002636482105007X
-
Bogacheva A.V., Bulakh E.M. Bukharova N.V. et al. Mycobiota of far Eastern Oak forests. Vladivostok, Dal`nauka, 2018. (in Russ.)
-
Bolshakov S.Yu., Potapov K.O., Ezhov O.N. et al. New species for regional mycobiotas of Russia. 1. Report 2016. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya. 2016. V. 50(5). P. 275–286.
-
Bukharova N.V. History of the study of aphyllophoroid fungi in the Russian Far East. Komarovskie chteniya. 2018. V. LXVI. P. 288–311. (in Russ.)
-
Bulakh E.M. New species of agaricoid fungi for Russia and the Russian Far East. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya. 2008. V. 42(5). P. 417–425. (in Russ.)
-
Bulakh E.M. Mushrooms of the Russian Far East. Vladivostok, Russkij ostrov, 2016. (in Russ.)
-
Crous P.W., Carnegie A.J., Wingfield M.J. et al. Fungal Planet description sheets: 868–950. Persoonia. 2019. V. 42. P. 291–473. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.11 https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.11
-
Justo A., Malysheva E., Bulyonkova T. et al. Molecular phylogeny phylogeography of Holarctic species of Pluteus section Pluteus (Agaricales: Pluteaceae), with description of twelve new species. Phytotaxa. 2014. V. 180(1). P. 1–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.180.1.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.180.1.1
-
Karatygin I.V., Nezdoiminogo E.L., Novozhilov Yu.K., Zhurbenko M.P. Mushrooms of the Russian Arctic. Sankt-Peterburg, Izdatel`stvo Sankt-Peterburgskoj gosudarstvennoj ximiko-farmacevticheskoj akademii, 1999. (in Russ.)
-
Kiyashko A.A., Malysheva E.F., Antonin V. et al. Fungi of the Russian far East 2. New species and new records of Marasmius (Marasmiaceae, Basidiomycota). Phytotaxa. 2014. 186(1). P. 001–028. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.186.1.1 http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.186.1.1
-
Lower plants, fungi and mosses of the Soviet Far East. Fungi. V. 1: Basidiomycetes: Russulaceae, Agaricaceae, Cortinariaceae, Paxillaceae, Gomphidiaceae, Strobilomycetaceae. Leningrad, Nauka, 1990. (in Russ.)
-
Malysheva E.F., Svetasheva T.Yu., Bulakh E.M. Fungi of the Russian Far East. 1. New combination and new species of the genus Leucoagaricus (Agaricaceae) with red-brown basidiomata. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya. 2013. V. 47(3). P. 169–179.
-
Noordeloos M.E., Morozova O.V. New and noteworthy Entoloma species from the Primorskiy Territory, Russian Far East. Mycotaxon. 2010. V. 112. P. 231–255. https://doi.org/10.5248/112.231 https://doi.org/10.5248/112.231
-
Rebriev Yu.A., Bulakh E.M. Morganella sosinii sp. nov. (Agaricaceae) from the Russian Far East. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya. 2015. V. 49(5). P. 293–296.
-
Sazanova N.A. Macromycetes of the Magadan region. Magadan, North-East Scientific Center of Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2009. (in Russ.)
-
Sazanova N.A. New species in mycobiota of the Magadan region. Bulletin of the North-East Scientific Center of Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2015. № 1. P. 69–76. (in Russ.)
-
Sazanova N.A., Rebriev Yu.A. Gasteromycetes of the Magadan oblast. Bulletin of the North-East Scientific Center of Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2019. № 4. P. 55–65. (in Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34078/1814-0998-2019-4-55-65 https://doi.org/10.34078/1814-0998-2019-4-55-65
-
Shiryaev A.G. Geographical specificy of the tundra and boreal biota of clavarioid fungi in Chukotka. Bull. MOIS. Ser. Biol. 2013. V. 118(5). P. 67–79. (in Russ.)
-
Shiryaev A.G. Spatial diversity of clavarioid mycota (Basidiomycota) at the forest-tundra ecotone. Mycoscience. 2018. V. 59(4). P. 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2018.02.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2018.02.007
-
Volobuev S.V., Bolshakov S.Yu., Shiryaev A.G. et al. New species for regional mycobiotas of Russia. 4. Report 2019. Mikologiya i fitopatologiya. 2019. V. 53(5). P. 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026364819050076 https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026364819050076
-
Zhou L.W., Spirin V., Vlasák J. Phellinidium asiaticum sp. nova (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota), the Asian kin of P. fragrans and P. pousarii. Ann. bot. fenn. 2014. V. 51(3). P. 167–172. https://doi.org/10.5735/085.053.0104 https://doi.org/10.5735/085.053.0104
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5156-8593